From Plausible to Actionable: A Position on LLM Self-Explanations
本文提出大语言模型(LLMs)生成的自我解释具有高度可塑性、存疑的忠实度及高度的可操作性。作者指出,针对此类解释的传统评估协议存在局限,并建议扩展评估标准至行动性维度。文章旨在提供评估其可塑性与忠实度的实用指南,强调通过 LLM 理性化能力支持多方利益相关者的知情决策与恰当行动。
EVENT DOSSIER
Regarding the self-explanation generated by large language models (LLMs), this paper points out that it is highly malleable, with questionable fidelity and high operability. The author believes that traditional evaluation protocols have limitations and suggests expanding evaluation criteria to include the dimension of operability. The article aims to provide a practical guide for evaluating the malleability and fidelity of LLM self-explanation, emphasizing the use of LLMs’ rationalizing capabilities to support informed decision-making and appropriate actions by multiple stakeholders.
本文提出大语言模型(LLMs)生成的自我解释具有高度可塑性、存疑的忠实度及高度的可操作性。作者指出,针对此类解释的传统评估协议存在局限,并建议扩展评估标准至行动性维度。文章旨在提供评估其可塑性与忠实度的实用指南,强调通过 LLM 理性化能力支持多方利益相关者的知情决策与恰当行动。