AuraTracer智迹闻
中文

EVENT DOSSIER

OECD’s latest report: Students who use less or no AI to complete their homework perform better than those who frequently use AI

2026-09-08 20:09 Models 🔥 42.2 heat score
1sources
1days unfolding
42.2heat score
3mentions
SummaryAI generated

The latest global education report released by the OECD indicates that students who do not use or use AI for homework less often perform better overall than those who use it frequently. The report is based on sample data from 760,000 students in 91 countries. Data shows that students who never use AI to write assignments scored an average of 509 points on science tests, while those who used such tools daily scored only 481 points on average – a difference equivalent to about one and a half years of teaching progress. The Director of the OECD Department of Education and Skills noted that learning requires active cognitive effort from the brain, and AI should be used as a supplementary tool rather than a shortcut to replace such effort. Although there is currently a divide in the use of AI in education, with less than 20% of students using it frequently, the report also suggests that moderate use may lead to better academic performance if students maintain critical thinking and control their usage frequency (e.g., once or twice a week). Additionally, if classroom requirements involve students assessing information generated by AI, their science scores can be 13 points higher for those who use it daily.

Related eventsRELATED EVENTS
Key entitiesKEY ENTITIES
BloombergIT HomeOECD

Coverage · reports per dayLANGUAGE SPLIT

Entity relations
Bloomberg × IT Home1Bloomberg × OECD1IT Home × OECD1

SignalsSIGNALS

Keyword heat
  • OECD2
  • IT Home1
  • Bloomberg1

All reports (1)SOURCES

I IT之家 zh 2026-09-08 20:09

经合组织最新报告:不用或少用 AI 完成课业的学生,整体表现优于常用 AI 的学生

经合组织最新教育报告显示,不使用或较少使用 AI 完成课业的学生整体表现优于常用 AI 的学生。报告覆盖 91 个国家、76 万名学生样本,显示从不使用 AI 起草写作作业的学生科学测试平均得分为 509 分,而每天使用此类任务的学生仅为 481 分,两者相差约一年半教学差距。经合组织教育与技能司司长安德烈亚斯·施莱歇尔指出,学习需大脑主动认知努力,AI 应作为“脚手架”而非让学生绕过努力的“拐杖”。尽管 AI 在教育中应用两极分化,且高频使用者比例不足 20%,但部分数据表明若学生保持批判性思考并控制频率,适度使用(如每周一次两次)可能带来更好成绩。此外,若课堂上要求学生判断和评估 AI 生成信息,每天使用者的科学成绩可高出 13 分。