AuraTracer智迹闻
中文

EVENT DOSSIER

Same Request, Different Answer: Quantization Amplifies Cache-Induced Divergence in LLM Serving

2026-09-07 12:00 Models 🔥 42.2 heat score
1sources
1days unfolding
42.2heat score
1mentions
SummaryAI generated

A recent study on large language model services confirms that quantitative operations significantly exacerbate the issue of non-reproducibility of execution results caused by caching mechanisms. The researchers compared the workload of using proxy tools under two engines and four weight formats, with fixed models, decoding parameters, random seeds, and request order. The results showed that with caching enabled, approximately 36.2% of rounds had changed proxy trajectories at 16-bit precision, while this proportion increased to 75.0% at 4-bit precision; in contrast, when caching was disabled, all execution results were identical. The study identified three key reasons: a single server-level cache setting for prompts expanded the difference between runs by 37.5 percentage points, and it only took effect when the execution order setting was activated; moreover, after resuming caching, while both the cached path and the recalculation path were reproducible, their results were different from each other. The study pointed out that although the service is deterministic under a given caching state, since the state is not included in the requests and is not reset by default, actual runs become non-reproducible. Additionally, single-round tests showed that this divergence affected the results of specific tasks…

Related eventsRELATED EVENTS
Key entitiesKEY ENTITIES
arXiv

SignalsSIGNALS

Keyword heat
  • arXiv1

All reports (1)SOURCES

A arXiv cs.LG en 2026-09-07 12:00

Same Request, Different Answer: Quantization Amplifies Cache-Induced Divergence in LLM Serving

一项针对大语言模型服务的研究证实,量化会显著加剧由缓存引起的不可复现性。研究人员在固定模型、解码参数、种子及请求顺序的条件下,使用两个引擎和四种权重格式运行了 80 个回合的代理工具使用工作负载。结果显示,启用缓存后,16 位精度下 36.2% 的回合中代理轨迹发生改变,而 4 位精度下该比例升至 75.0%;禁用缓存时所有执行结果完全一致。实验定位到三个原因:单个服务器级提示词缓存设置将运行间差异扩大 37.5 个百分点,执行顺序仅在设置激活时生效,且恢复缓存状态后缓存与重算路径虽各自可复现但仍相互不同。研究指出,给定缓存状态缓存服务是确定性的,但因请求中不包含该状态且默认不重置,导致实际不可复现,同时单轮测试表明这种发散已影响任务结果而不改变整体准确率。