When Does an Interpretation Count as Established? The Formation, Evaluation, and Responsibility of Interpretation in Generative AI

Regarding the issue of defining the validity of explanations in generative AI, relevant research suggests that five common requirements must be met to distinguish between local pass and research-based boundaries. Core concepts include: the appearance of explanations (the gap between the finished product and the traceable process), evaluation contracts (the boundary conditions for determining local validity), and alternative standing (the act of transforming inadequate local passes into stronger claims). Research finds that although texts may be recognized, they are insufficient as sufficient evidence if they lack public justification statements,反驳 mechanisms, and withdrawal structures. To address this, the study introduces the practice of “delayed closure,” emphasizing that mere local evaluation, finished product form, and public recognition cannot provide sufficient proof of the formation of explanations. This analysis is conceptual and normative in nature; it does not set a benchmark for model understanding or determine whether it possesses understanding capabilities.